' This is a revision petition against the order dated 19-11-1975 of the Additional Commissioner, Hyderabad in respect of S. Nos. 100 and 108 of Deh. Dourang, Taluka Badin.
2. The petitioner is present with his counsel Mr. S. M. Kella. The respondent is present with his counsel Mr. Rustam Khan Talpur. Munshi Ali Muhammad Tapedar and Mr. Abdul Ghafoor Mukhtiarkar are present with record. The counsels have been heard and the record perused.
3. The disputed land has been granted to respondent on Harap conditions. The appeal of the petitioner has been rejected vide the impugned order.
4. The disputed land has been granted to the respondent mainly on the ground that his name is entered as Hari of S. No, 100 in Khasra Girdawari for the year 1972-73 and 1973-74. The counsel for the petitioner contends that the entries in the Khasra Girdawari were not correct and has referred to a Rubkari No, 259, dated 3-2-1975 issued by the Mukhtiarkar Badin according to which S. No, 100 was shown in record as Banjar Qadim and name of no one was entered as a Hari in the records.
The counsel for the petitioner to a site inspection report of Mukhtiarkar conducted a few days earlier than Katehery. According to this report the petitioner had his house in S. No, 69 of the Deh.
The counsel for the respondent mainly relies on the entries in Khasra Girdawari and argues that the petitioner is not a genuine and bona fide Hari of the Deh.
5. I have considered the case. In view of the Rubkari and the site inspection report of Mukhtiarkar, the entries in Khasra Girdawari carry no A weight. There is no trace of the respondent in the report although the site inspection was conducted in presence of Natho, father of the respondent. The counsel for the respondent is not able to produce any other evidence of record to show that he had any preferential right to grant of disputed land. As against this the claim of the petitioner is supported by the site report of Mukhtiarkar. In view of this position the petitioner has better claim over grant of the land and the revision petition is. Therefore, upheld and disputed land is granted to the petitioner on usual terms and conditions.