ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.--This Order shall dispose of Cr.P. No.42-R of 1985 filed by Muhammad Siddiq, accused /convict, and Cr. Petition No. 40-R of 1985 filed by Muhammad Akram, Complainant, for the enhancement of the sentence of Mohammad Siddiq (respondent in the last mentioned petition).
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners in both petitions. The learned counsel for the accused/ respondent in Cr. Petition No.42-R of 1985 has not raised any legal contention and only wants a reappraisal of the evidence on the record for the reversal of findings of facts arrived at by Courts below. After going through the impugned judgment and considering the contentions raised by the petitioner's counsel we do not consider this to be a fit case for reappraisal of evidence. Cr. Petition no.42-R of 1985 is, therefore, dismissed.
3. As for Cr. Petition No.40-R of 1985 filed, by Mohammad Akram, Complainant, for the enhancement of the sentences of Mohammad Siddiq, we find that the reasons recorded by the High Court for reducing his sentence from death to imprisonment for life are valid and proper. We do not, therefore, consider it a fit case for interference. This petition, too, is therefore, dismissed.
4. This dispose of both the petitions. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.