1. MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, A. C. J.-The dispute relates to the transfer of a house under the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958.
2. The Settlement authorities divided the house and transferred it to the petitioner and the respondents according to their respective possession. This order was maintained by the High Court in writ jurisdiction and leave to appeal was refused by this Court.
3. The petitioner again approached the Deputy Settlement Commissioner with the prayer that his part of the house may be demarcated and managed to obtain a report from him that the house was impartible. This was a clumsy attempt to reopen the case. The higher Settlement authorities did not agree with the Deputy Settlement Commissioner and the High Court has again dismissed the writ petition fled by the petitioner to call in question the orders passed by the Settlement authorities. He now seeks leave to appeal.
4. It is sufficient to state that the petitioner has under the disguise of "demarcation" tried to abuse the process of the Court and should think himself fortunate that the High Court has not' taken action against him for resorting to such a course.
5. The petition is dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.