1. ' The applicants, Ghulam Murtaza and his brother Allah Bux were involved in a case of murder of Mst. Husna wife of Allah Bux. However, in the F.I.R. Lodged by Molvi Muhammad Hashim, father of Mst. Husna, on 28-6-1985, there was no mention of any crime having been committed by any one and the F.I.R. Was merely lodged on the basis that Husna might have taken some poison on account of her quarrel with her Mother-in7law, Mst. Sharma. However, the post-mortem report of Mst. Husna was 'received on 29-6-1985 and the same showed that her neck had been broken and, therefore, the case under section 302, P.P.C. Was registered. On 7-8-1985 further statement of complainant was recorded where he alleged that his daughter had been murdered b the present applicants. This statement was made by him on the basis of the statements of 2 witnesses, Jan Muhammad and Qurban Ali. Thes two persons in their respective statements recorded on 13-8- 1985 had stated that they have seen Allah Bux and Ghulam Murtaza draggin: Mst. Husna forcibly to the Otaque on the day of incident and they have heard her cries. What, however, is important to note is tha these persons stated that they have informed the complainant of this A fact before the complainant had gone to lodge the F.I.R. But surprising! The complainant did not mention this fact in his F.I.R.
2. ' In the above circumstances, some doubt is attached to th statements which have been recorded on 7-8-1985 and thereafter, and these applicants are, therefore, are entitled to bail as further enquir is clearly indicated in respect of their involvement. It , therefore, ordered that the applicants be released on bail on providing one suret for each of them in the sum of Rs, 20,000 and P.B. In the same amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
3. ' Mr. Imam Ali Memon is present for the State and has fairly pointed out the relevant facts in the case.
4. Bail granted.