' This writ petition, which was in limine, is admitted to a regular hearing as the learned counsel for respondent No, 3 has accepted notice and is being disposed of today by the consent of the parties.
2. There has been a conciliatory talk in this case in keeping with the spirit of the statute out of which these proceedings arise. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No,3 stated that he has full instructions to settle the, matter, if possible, to secure his clients best interests.
3. As a result of conciliatory talk between the two learned counsel in which the petitioner also participated, it has been agreed to: That the petitioner shall pay in Court readily a sum of Rs,35,00 by way of cross cheque in the name of respondent No, 3 in full settlement of all the claims of the respondent arising out of the matrimony. Learned counsel for respondent No, 3 states that respondent .Shall not claim any further sums including the dower etc. From the petitioner as the entire matrimonial dispute no comes to an end. He has accordingly accepted in Court the cross cheque in question.
4. I have considered the compromise. It appears to be lawful and is otherwise in public interest because it shortens litigation. I would allow this compromise and dispose of the writ petition accordingly. There shall, however, be no order as to costs in view of the course adopted by the parties. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.