Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1986 MLD 1108

ALLAH YAR vs RESIDENT MAGISTRATE, SILLANWALI and 2 others

Citation1986 MLD 1108
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Writ Petition No, 1987 of 1986
Date1986-05-18
Judge(s)Malik Lehrasab Khan
Resultpetition dismissed

ORDER

' Through the instant constitutional petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 22-4- 1986 passed by respondent No,1, i.e. Resident Magistrate, Sillanwali, whereby he has directed respondent No,2, viz. S.H.O. P.S. Sillanwali, District Sargodha, to register a case against the petitioner on the basis of an application filed by respondent No,3.

2. It has been contended in the writ petition that the petitioner had gone to the house of Wali Muhammad etc. To settle a mutual family dispute between Wali Muhammad and Ali Muhammad, respondent No,3, but during the course of negotiations, respondent No,3 abused the petitioner and asked him as to why he had come to their house. Partisans of All Muhammad also, reached the' spot armed with Sotas and gave beatings to him. He received injuries on different parts of . His body and consequently a case under section 307/148/149, P.P.C. Was registered against Ali Muhammad, Muhammad Aslam, Zafar Ahmed, Yousuf and Ahmad Sher. It has also been alleged that in the course of the above incident Muhammad Aslam and Zafar Ahmed aforesaid also received minor injuries. On the basis of their injuries, respondent No,3 moved an application before respondent No,1 requesting him to pass an order for registration of a case under section 452/323, P.P.C. Against the petitioner. The police originally reported that no case under section 452/323, P.P.C. Was made out, but again through the impunged order, respondent No,1 directed the police to register a case.

3. It has been argued on behalf of the petitioner that the Resident Magistrate i.e. Respondent No,1 had no jurisdiction to pass an order directing the S.H.O. , P.S. Sillanwali, to register a case and, therefore, the impugned order was without jurisdiction and without lawful authority and thus a nullity in the eye of law.

4. The above contention raised on behalf of the petitioner has no force. By virtue of the provisions of section 156(3), Cr.P.C. The Maga Magistrate could direct the police to register a case and to investigate into the same. The impunged order passed by the learned Resident Magistrate, Sillanwali, amounts to a judicial order passed by him and the petitioner in the first instance should seek ordinary judicial remedy against the said order before the Appellete/Revisional Court. He cannot directly invoke the extraordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court.

5.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is not legally competent and is accordingly dismissed in limine.

Constitutional .

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch