1. SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.-- The petitioner, a civil servant, seeks review of an order of this Court, dated 16th December, 1986 refusing him leave to appeal under Article 212(3) of the Constitution.
2. The only ground on which the review is sought is that what this Court treated as the second representation was, in fact, the first representation and if that mistake had not occurred the conclusion drawn with regard to the appeal before the tribunal being the-barred would not have been drawn.
3. It appears that even the review petition filed in this Court is barred by 184 days. The judgment was delivered on 16th December 1980. The application for a copy of the judgment was filed on 3rd February 1981, that is, after the period of limitation had expired. The copy was ready on 21st March, 1981 but its delivery was taken on 27th July, 1981 and then the review petition was filed on 28th July, 1981 The reason advanced for making an application for a copy of the judgment after the expiry of the period of limitation is not rooted in any personal disability of the petitioner but the failure of his Advocate---on-Record to inform him at a proper the of the judgment and also his own pre- occupations with the medical care and attention to his ailing sister. These grounds are not sufficient for explaining the delay in filing a review petition. Hence it is dismissed as being the- barred.