1. ' This application has been made under section 51 read with section 38(5) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 for taking action against the respondents for the non-implementation of the order of Punjab Labour Court No,5, Faisalabad dated 15-7-1981, the appeal against which is pending in this Tribunal. The explanation of the petitioner was called for remaining absent without leave on 3-3-1982 and coming late on 4-3-1982 serving upon him second show-cause notice. In the complaint it has been complained that even though the instructions were issued by this court on 25-11-1981 for granting due leave and releasing current increments, the respondents have failed to carry out the orders, inasmuch as leave has not been granted and bonus has not been paid. The petitioner has said that he made an application for leave and was told that the leave would be sanctioned, therefore, he availed of it but it was not sanctioned. In the complaint it is not mentioned so. Always the leave is availed of after it has been sanctioned. This is not the allegation that the leave was refused. So far as the bonus is concerned, firstly there is no mention in the complaint that the bonus has not been paid and secondly this is not the case of the petitioner that he had made application for the payment of bonus and that the same had been refused. It appears that since an action is being taken against the petitioner, he has made the complaint, otherwise no contempt appears to have been committed. The complaint, therefore, is filed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.