' The order dated 10th September, 1984 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No 2, Lahore is informed to be wrong and improper.
2. The petitioner was a Badli Conductor. He seeks a declaration for confirmation on the ground that he had worked for more than nine months. The concept of Badli in P.U.T.C. May be different from the one defined in Standing Order 1 of Standing Orders Ordinance, 1968 but at this stage it cannot be said if the petitioner would ultimately succeed or A fail. The point, however, is arguable. Balance of convenience goes in favour of the petitioner. Irreparable injury is likely to be suffered by him if before his petition is finally decided, he is terminated as he is being treated as an irregular employee. So the order refusing the stay order is not legal.
3. As a result, the revision is accepted and setting aside the impugned order of the learned lower Court, the respondent is directed not to terminate B the services of the petitioner till the decision of his grievance petition on the ground that he is not a regular employee.