1. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--After arguing the matter at some length learned counsel states that the decision of this petition by this Court might prejudice the petitioner's case in a writ petition filed in the High Court from the judgment in appeal by the District Court passed after the High Court had passed the impugned remand order.
2. He accordingly, without prejudice to the petitioners right to press all the available points in the High Court, has not pressed this petition.
3. He did so also on the undertaking by the learned counsel for the respondent that the eviction order impugned before the High Court in the Writ Petition now pending, would not be executed for 15 days so as to enable the petitioner to seek and obtain a fresh stay order in the said Writ petition by making an application before the High Court.
4. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as not pressed with the observation that this order shall in no way prejudice the petitioners case pending in the High Court.