' In a suit for permanent injunction brought by the petitioners against the respondents, they moved an application for grant of temporary injunction. It was allowed by the learned trial Court. The respondents went in appeal and the learned Additional District Judge, who heard it, vacated the temporary injunction and dismissed the petitioner's application. They have now come to this Court under section 115, C.P.C.
2. The learned counsel for the parties have been heard. To avoid prolongation of this litigation, without prejudice to the respondent's rights in the main suit, their learned counsel has no objection if status quo as to the alienation of the property is ordered to be maintained till the decision of the suit, provided it is disposed of expeditiously.
3. The suit is stated to be at the evidence stage. Let it be finally decided by the 31st of May, 1985. The property in dispute shall not be alienated or disposed of in any manner by the respondents till the decision of the suit. The revision petition is disposed of accordingly, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.
Stay granted.