Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1985 SCMR 565

MUHAMMAD AMIR And 2 Others vs The STATE

Citation1985 SCMR 565
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 253 of 1984 Crl. Misc. No. 1198-B
Date1984-11-19
Judge(s)Nasim Hasan Shah, Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Haleem, Shafi-ur-
ResultAppeal accepted

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.-- Muhammad Amir, Bashir and Jehan petitioners applied for leave to appeal against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court dated 4-7-1984, dismissing their bail application.

2. The petitioners alongwith 3 others are accused of the murder of Muhammad Ramzan.

The motive for the offence is stated to be that Muhammad Ramzan (deceased) was suspected of having illicit relations with Mst. Sawai daughter of Muhammad Nawaz co-accused. All the accused are said to have inflicted hatchet blows (with its reverse side) to Muhammad Ramzan on his legs as a result of which he died.

3. The allegation against Muhammad Amir petitioner is that he was carrying a revolver but he did not use it and, instead, is stated to have snatched the -hatchet of Jehan co-accused and inflicted injuries with its blunt side on the legs of the deceased. The allegation against Jehan petitioner is that he gave injury with the blunt side of his hatchet on the legs of the deceased.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner did not press the petition with regard to Bashir co- accused.

5. We issued notice to the State and Rao M.Yousaf, has appeared on behalf of the State.

The petitioners' counsel argued that if Muhammad Amir had gone armed with a revolver with the intention to kill Muhammad Ramzan, he would have used it rather than snatching the hatchet from someone else and inflicted injuries therewith. As regards Jehan petitioner, he submitted that the only allegation against him is that he caused injuries on non-vital part of the deceased which has not been substantiated by) the medical report.

6. After having given our anxious thought to these contentions we feel that this is a case of 'further inquiry'. We, therefore, convert the petition into appeal and allow the same, and grant bail to Muhammad Amir and Jehan petitioners, in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount, each, to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Mianwali .

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch