Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1985 MLD 1133

Mst. RASOOLAN BIBEE vs MUHAMMAD RASHID

Citation1985 MLD 1133
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Transfer Application No, 253/C of 1983
Date1984-03-16
Judge(s)Mian Mahboob Ahmad
ResultPetition allowed

' This petition under section 25-A of the Family Courts Act seeks the transfer of the application for custody of minors titled Muhammad Rashid v. Rasoolan Bibi from the Court of Guardian Judge, Lahore to the Court of Guardian Judge Pakpattan, where other litigation between the parties is already pending viz. The suit for dissolution of marriage and suit for maintenance filed by the petitioner against the respondent and suit for restitution of conjugal rights filed by the respondent against the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the filing of the present application by the respondent against the petitioner for seeking custody of minors is yet another step taken by him to cause harassm ent to the petitioner. He further submits that the present application was instituted by the respondent on 22nd of March, 1983, after his suit for restitution of conjugal rights had been transferred from Lahore to Pakpattan by order of this Court, dated 16th of March, 1983, passed in Transfer Application No, 228-C of 1982.

3. The learned counsel next contends that the minors are admittedly residing at Pakpattan with the petitioner and, therefore, there will be no impediment in the way of trial of this application of the respondent there.

4. The last contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there are common questions of law and facts involved in the litigation between the parties and it will be in the interest of justice that all the cases between the parties are tried by one and the same Court to avoid conflict of judgments.

5. The respondent, who is present in person, has objected to the transfer of this application only on the ground that since the minors were abducted from Lahore, he has a right to institute the suit at Lahore. He has however, not been able to give any reason why the case should not be transferred.

6. Having given consideration to the controversy, I am of the view that it is not the jurisdiction to institute the application for custody of the minors which has been challenged before me but it is the transfer of this application sought on the grounds enumerated above. The reasons advanced have force and these find support from the settled principles governing the trial and transfer of litigation between the same parties arising under the Family Law.

7. In view of the foregoing discussion, accepting this petition, I direct that the application of respondent for custody of minors titled Muhammad Rashid v. Mst. Rasoolan Bibi be withdrawn from the Guardian Judge, Lahore, and entrusted to the Guardian Judge/Family Court Pakpattan, for adjudication in accordance with law. The parties shall appear before the Court at Pakpattan on 14th of April, 1984.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch