' On a Mukhbari application the land was cancelled on 20-2-1976 and it was directed to be allotted to the informer. It was allotted to the petitioner on 22-3-1976 but later on the order was re-called on the ground that her name had been inserted in the Mukhbari application and that was a forgery.
This is vide order dated 22-3-1976. It was directed that the land be allotted to the other Mukhbar, Dawood Khan. This was challenged by the petitioner through the afore titled Constitutional petition.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has expired. Twice notice was sent to the petitioner but no response has been made. A perusal of the affidavit filed along with the petition shows that it was filed by Dawood Khan. The person who had been allowed allotment in the last mentioned order dated 22-3-1976. Since the land has been ordered to be allotted to the petitioner's own attorney, that may be the reason that no response is made by the petitioner to the notices issued to her
3. In view of the above, this petition Is dismissed.