1. ' Mst. Balqis Begum petitioner is involved in a case under Articles 16 and 10 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979. She has moved this petition for bail.
2. ' Mst. Balqis Begum Petitioner is a married woman. The F.I.R. Was lodged by her father on 9th April, 1985 wherein he alleged that about a month earlier she eloped with Kala but after fifteen days she was restored to him through Panchayat. On 7th April, 1985 she again disappeared from his house.
3. He searched for her and was informed by Bashir Hussain and Muhammad Ali that they had seen her going with afore mentioned Kala. In the F.I.R. It is alleged that the petitioner had gone with Kala co-accused for having illicit intercourse.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that Article 16 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, is not attracted and there is no eye-witness to the commission of Zina.
4. The learned State counsel has opposed the prayer for bail.
5. 3.I have gone shows that there is 16 of the Ordinance therefore, admit her the like amount to Magistrate, Lahore C through the relevant material. Perusal of the file no eye-witness of the commission of Zina. Section is not attracted in the case of the petitioner. I, to bail in the sum of Rs,10,000 with one surety in the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/Duty cantt. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.