M.S.H. QURAISHI, J.--In these to petitions filed fur review of this Court's order, dated 23-8-1984 dismissing Civil Petitions Nos. 883 and 884 of 1981, it is urged that the High Court had mistaken Mutation No. 1077 sanctioned on 15th May, 1964 to be mutation of the sale in question but the said mutation was in fact of inheritance and not of the sale. Learned counsel points out that the sale mutation was No. 1107 sanctioned on 31st July, 1964 and urges that the error which occurred in the High Court had been carried forward to this Court.1 No such point had been taken in the Petitions for Leave to Appeal nor argued before this Court during the hearing of those petitions. So far this Court is concerned, the sale mutation had been correctly noted as being No. 1107 sanctioned on 31st July, 1964. In any case nothing turns on it because the error in the order of the High Court is nothing more than a mis-description.
2. After hearing learned counsel we feel satisfied that no case is made out for review. The petitions are dismissed.