' Learned counsel submits that the petitioners have no connection whatsoever with Manzoor, who is accused in a case registered vide F.I.R. No, 39, dated 31st March, 1980, at Police Station Chuharkana, District Sheikhupura. He submits that merely because the above-mentioned accused was related to the petitioners, the latter were summoned by the Police Officer, tortured, humiliated and forced to disclose the whereabouts of the accused, who is said to be absconder. It is submitted that petitioners 1 and 2 are blind persons and petitioner No,3 is the wife of petitioner No,
2. He states that even otherwise, they are unable to render any assistance to the police for capturing the aforementioned accused. It is contended that the respondents are not proceedings in accordance with the procedure laid down in para. 25.2 of the Police Rules, 1934. Reliance in this connection is also placed on Haji Dilshad Islam v.
Punjab Province PLD 1975 Lah. 521, 523.
2. The respondents are directed to proceed strictly in accordance with law and not to coerce or harass the petitioners who apparently cannot assist them in capturing the accused.
3. With the above observation, this petition stands disposed of.
Observation accordingly. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.