ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.--The petitioners seek leave to appeal against the judgment of the High Court, dated 4-12-1979, dismissing their civil revision.
2. The petitioners had filed a suit for possession of the house which they claimed to have purchased through a sale-deed dated 5-8-1947. Seven issues were framed. Out of these the main issue (i.e Issue No. 5) reads as follows:-- "(5) Whether the sale-deed, dated 5-8-1947 is fictitious, fraudulent and forged, and if so, what effect, O.P.D.?"
It is evident that this issue relates to, is a question of fact and all the three Courts below have decided against the petitioners.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners urged that the learned Court, below have ignored material evidence on the record.
4. We have carefully considered this contention but are of the view that the learned Courts below have carefully considered the evidence referred to by the learned counsel for the petitioner and reached a correct conclusion. The matter, therefore does not warrant interference' by this Court.
5. The petition is consequently dismissed as having no merit. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.