' The decision, dated 7th December, 1983 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No, 2, Lahore has been challenged in this appeal, whereby the respondent was directed to be promoted as Commercial Supervisor in Grade-11.
2. The respondent was a Stationmaster. On 18th March, 1976 his vision failed and he was declared fit for C-1. He was absorbed as Goods Clerk in his existing scale. But his seniority was fixed according to the date on which he was absorbed as Goods Clerk. In March, 1978, the posts of Goods Clerk were upgraded from Grade No, 8 to Grade No,
11. As the respondent's seniority had been fixed according to the date of his appointment as Goods Clerk, so treating him as junior to those who were already Goods Clerk before his appointment as such, he was not given Scale No, 11 and was not appointed as Commercial Supervisor. It has been argued by the learned counsel that since the respondent was junior, the decision of the learned lower Court is wrong. This mistake occured when the seniority of the respondent was fixed wrongly. According to section 5, rule 6, seniority of a vision failed employee is to be fixed on the absorbed post according to his original date of appointment and not from the date he was absorbed The respondent was thus senior to those whose date of appointment as Goods Clerk was after the original date of the recruitment of the respondent. He was thus entitled to be given Scale No, 11 and appointed as Commercial Supervisor and his grievance petition was rightly accepted by the learned lower Court.
3. As a result, the appeal fails and is hereby dismissed.