Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1985 SCMR 141

BLUNDA vs MUHAMMAD DIN And Other

Citation1985 SCMR 141
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 915 of 1981
Date1984-08-22
Judge(s)Muhammad Afzal Zullah, M. S. H. Qureshi
ResultLeave granted

ORDER

1. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--Leave to appeal has been sough from judgment dated 8-7-1981 of the Lahore High Court; whereby : Constitutional petition arising out of an urban settlement case, was dismissed.

2. The petitioner being admittedly a non-claimant displaced person was transferred the property in dispute on his N.C.H. Form in 1959; without proper procedure. This transfer was ignored and the propert3 was auctioned. The learned Judge in the High Court after noticing the arguments advanced from the petitioner side which on face were very weighty, dismissed his Constitutional petition on the ground: first that it suffered from laches and secondly that in the year, 1975 the Settlement Commissioner could not have granted relief to the petitioner in his revisional jurisdiction on account of the repeal of the settlement laws.

3. Learned counsel has contended that the Settlement Commissioner having refused to exercise the revisional jurisdiction on 17-3-1975, the Constitutional petition was filed on 31st of March, 1975 therefore, it did not suffer from laches. He also contended that it was a pending case, therefore, the Settlement Commissioner was competent not with--standing the repeal of the laws to grant relief to the petitioner. Therefore it was a case of failure to exercise jurisdiction.

4. After hearing the learned counsel we consider it a fit case for grant of leave to appeal to examine the contentions raised before the High Court and noted in paragraph 3 of the impugned judgment, together with the other connected points including those noted above.

5. Order accordingly.

6. Security Rs. 2,500.

7. The appeal to be prepared on the present record and made ready for hearing within this year.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch