' Appellants' contention inter alia that the learned trial Court has failed to record its findings on issues Nos. 5 and 6 after the original order of remand, dated 3-7-1978 was reviewed on 8-5-1979 requires further examination.
2. Admit. Notice.
3. At this stage Ch. Abdul Rehman, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and wants to make a statement. Let his statement be recorded.
' Statement of Ch. Abdul Rehman, Advocate, counsel for the Respondents.
' After going through the judgment of the learned trial Court, dated 16-5-1984 it has been found that the view taken by the learned trial Judge that findings on issues Nos. 5 and 6 have already been confirmed is not correct as, according to the order, dated 8-5-1979 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, the trial Court had to record its findings on these issues as well. Under the circumstances the respondents have no objection if the judgment of the learned trial Court and that of the appellate Court be set aside and the case remanded to the learned trial Court for re- writing the judgment after giving findings on issues Nos. 4, 5 and 6. The parties should be allowed to address arguments before the learned trial Court on the aforementioned issues.
' R.0.&.A.C.
' Dated 18-2-1985.
' Presence as before.
Statement of learned counsel for the respondents has been recorded. Learned counsel for the appellants has no objection to the disposal of this appeal in the light of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents. The appeal has been accordingly disposed of through a separate order.