Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1985 P Cr. L J 1966(2)

ARSHAD HUSSAIN vs THE STATE

Citation1985 P Cr. L J 1966(2)
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Revision No, 314 of 1970
Date1985-04-13
Judge(s)Rustam S. Sidhwa
ResultPetition accepted

' This is a revision petition filed by Arshad Hussain, petitioner, against the judgment of an Additional Sessions Judge of Lahore, dated 4-3-1970, dismissing his appeal. Earlier, a First Class Magistrate of Lahore, by his judgment, dated 31-1-1967, had convicted the petitioner under section 304-A, P.P.C.

And sentenced him to two years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs,500 or in default thereof to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for six months.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 10-2-1965 the deceased Chhanga was going on Ferozepur road towards Kahna from Lahore side and Ghulam Muhammad P.W.5 was sitting behind him on the carrier of his cycle. Near the Glaxo Factory, a bus No,299-LEC of Lahore Transport Society, which was being driven by Arshad Hussain, petitioner came from the Lahore side. The bus collided with the cycle of the deceased and as a result thereof Ghulam Muhammad P.W.5 fell down from the carrier on the Katcha side of the road. The deceased Chhanga was run over by the bus and his body was dragged for some distance on the road. The deceased was taken to the hospital, where he died and the petitioner was consequently challaned by the police for the offence.

3. 1 have heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State and have perused the record. The eye-witnesses of the occurrence are Taj Din P.W.1, Niaz All P.W.2, Subhan Khan P.W.3 and Ghulam Muhammad P.W.5. Taj Din P.W.1 and Niaz an P.W.2 admit that the bus was being driven at a speed of about 30-35 miles per hour. Both these witnesses and Subhan Khan P.W.3 also admit that Ghulam Muhammad P.W.5 jumped off from the carrier of the deceased's cycle, just before the accident. In this connection, Taj Din P.W.1 stated that when Ghulam Muhammad P.W.5 jumped off, the cycle got a jerk, whereas Subhan Khan P.W.3 states that the cycle got out of control and swerved to the right, whereupon the deceased lost his balance and the cycle came in the line of the motion of the bus and was run over. Ghulam Muhammad P.W.5, however, has denied having jumped off from the carrier of the deceased's cycle, on hearing the horn of the bus. According to him, he fell down from the carrier, after the bus hit the deceased's cycle, where after he fainted. Subhan Khan P.W.3 also admits that the bus sounded its horn before the accident. From the totality of the evidence, the case of the petitioner, namely, that the deceased's cycle got out of control, after Ghulam Muhammad P.W.5 jumped off his carrier, and swerved into the path and of the bus, appears to be reasonably probable. In these circumstances, the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of doubt.

4. For the foregoing reasons, this petition is accepted and the conviction and sentence of Arshad Hussain, petitioner are set aside. The petitioner is on bail. His bail bond shall stand discharged.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch