1. ' The facts giving rise to this present revision are that Albert Masih and others were tried under Ss.
2. 307/366 and 376/511, P.P.C. By Magistrate Section 30, Samundri. On the conclusion of the trial Mst.
3. Zeenat co-accused was acquitted but Albert petitioner and Sarwar co-accused were convicted under section 324, P.P.C. And sentenced to two years' R.I. The appeal filed by the petitioner failed on 1-11-1984, hence this revision.
4. 2 The learned counsel for the petitioner has not challenged the conviction. He has requested for reduction in the sentence on the ground that the sentence of Sarwar co-convict has already been reduced by this Court from two years' R.I. To 9 months' R.I. The learned counsel for the State as not opposed the prayer.
5. 3 I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 1 find that since the sentence of co-convict against whom the allegations were identical, has been reduced from two years to 9 months, the petitioner should also be treated at par with him. The sentence of the petitioner is therefore reduced from two years' R.I. To 9 months' R.I.