' Criminal Miscellaneous No, 64-M of 1984 Learned counsel submits that inadvertently the appeal could not be filed as the petitioner was under the impression that he has been convicted under sections 302 and 323/34, P.P.C. Only but when his sentence was suspended and he approached the jail authority he learnt that he had also been convicted under the Arms Ordinance. Hence he has submitted an application for condo nation of delay in filing the appeal.
2. The application is granted.
3. As regards the application for suspension of sentence, it is stated that the petitioner's sentence of life imprisonment has since been suspended and he has been ordered to be released on bail in Criminal Appeal No, 122 of 1983.
4. As the period of imprisonment is short, I suspend its operation and admit the petitioner/appellant to bail in the sum of Rs,7,000 (Seven thousand) with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C. Sahiwal in the case under Arms Ordinance.
5. Appeal shall come up along with Criminal Appeal No, 122 of 1983.