Pakistan Case Law← Search
1984 PLC 921

ZONAL WORKERS' UNION IRRIGATION, LAHORE vs IRRIGATION EMPLOYEES'

Citation1984 PLC 921
CourtLabour Appellate Tribunal
Judge(s)Sardar Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi
ResultCase remanded

' This revision is directed against the order, dated 13th April, 1982 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No, 3 Lahore at Ferozewala, whereby direction was given to the Registrar to issue C. B. A. Certificate to respondent No, 1 union on its application made under section 8 (7) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. The petitioner union which claims to be C.

B. A. Was not impleaded as a party.

2. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no direction to issue C. B. A.

Certificate can be issued to the Registrar under section 8 (7) that respondent No, 1 union not being the only union as the petitioner union existed, so without referendum no C. B. A. Certificate could be issued ; that the petitioner union being C. B. A. No question of declaring any other union as C. B. A.

Could arise and that Labour Court, Ferozewala had no jurisdiction.

3. In reply filed by the Registrar, it is clearly mentioned that respondent No, 1 union was not the only registered union, but another registered union namely, the petitioner union, also existed and thus without referendum under section 22 (2) respondent No, 1 union could not be declared as C. B. A.

After getting this information it was necessary for the learned lower Court to direct respondent No, 1 to implead the petitioner as party and decide if only one or more unions existed and after that he could have issued direction to the Registrar. Section 8 (7) deals with the change of office-bearers of a union. Respondent No, 1 union did not ask for the registration of any change in office-bearers.

There is no provision in section 8 (7) to issue any certificate of C. B. A. Section 22 (1) applies where there is only one union having its members not less than one-third of the total members. Where there are more than one union, section 22 (2) applies which says that referendum shall be held.

4. As a result of what has been said above, I accept the revisions and setting aside the impugned order of the learned lower Court, remand the case with the direction that impleading the petitioner as party to the petition made by respondent No, 1 and after giving opportunity of evidence any the petition be redecided.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search