1. ' The learned Advocate for the applicant submitted, that no overt act of causing injury to the deceased and injured Abdul Sattar are attributed to the present applicant. The present applicant no doubt was arrested, near the ward at and his stand is that he was there looking for his cattle and as such the question, whether he was one of the assailants and had common intention with them to murder deceased Muhammad Hashim would require further inquiry, at the stage of trial.
2. ' The learned Assistant Advocate-General in view of the above facts does not oppose the above bail application.
3. I have considered the above submissions made by the learned for the applicant and find that injuries to the deceased and the injured Abdul Sattar are not attributed at all to the present applicant On the contrary the present applicant has received injuries in the incident in question. In view of this, whether present applicant was one of the accomplices who attacked the deceased and had common intention with the other co-accused to kill him would require further inquiry at the stage of trial.
4. ' In view of this I allow the above application and direct that the applicant may be released on bail, on his furnishing surety in the sum of B Rs, 30,000 with P.R. Bond in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.