1. ' ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.-This case relates to an objection petition in execution proceedings.
2. Muhammad Hanif respondent No, 1 filed a suit against Mst. Rafiqan respondent No, 2 for specific performance of an-agreement to sell, a house, which had been transferred to her by the Settlement Department against a claim belonging to her and her two sons Umer Din and Hakeem- ud-Din (petitioners herein). The suit was decreed, whereupon Mst. Rafiqan filed an appeal, but the same was dismissed by the learned Additional/District Judge. She then filed a second appeal in the High Court which too was dismissed. Thereafter she approached the Supreme Court but her petition for leave to appeal was dismissed. Muhammad Hanif respondent No, I then sought the execution of the decree, but Umer Din and Hakam Din petitioners the sons of Mst. Rafiqan filed on objection petition. This was, however, dismissed by the learned trial Court. The petitioner then filed an appeal. That too was dismissed by the learned Additional District Judge. They again challenged the said order before the High Court which was dismissed vide the impugned judgment. Hence the present petition. Considering the history of the case, and a reading of the orders of the various Courts which considered the matter of various stages, it is evident that the objection petition was a frivolous one and had been filed by the two sons of Mst. Rakan merely to prolong the matter in a desperate bid to retain the possession of the house in dispute as long as possible. As such we do not consider it a fit case for interference.
3. ' The petition is, therefore, dismissed.