Pakistan Case Law← Search
1984 SCMR 1033(2)

UMER AHAD alias MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE vs SARFRAZ KHAN AND ANOTHER

Citation1984 SCMR 1033(2)
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No, 4-K in Criminal Petition No, 4-K of 1984
Date1984-04-15
Judge(s)Muhammad Haleem, Zaffar Hussain Mirza, M. S. H. Qureshi, Abdul Qadir
ResultPetition dismissed

ORDER

M. S. H. OURAISHI, J.-The petitioner, by this miscellaneous petition, seeks the restoration of his Leave Petition which had been dismissed by Court for non-appearance on 9-4-1984. He has submitted that he was present in Court on that date but could not know when the case was called and when he enquired towards the end of the day, he was told of the petition having already been dismissed.

Since the petitioner was not represented, we accept his prayer and restore the Leave Petition.

2. On merits, the grievance of the petitioner is that the learned Judge of the High Court has, in an application moved for cancellation of his bail in a murder case, decided the question of his age thereby fixing the Court which would have jurisdiction to try the case. The petitioner's case on the basis of a birth certificate issued by the Badin Municipality was that he being less than 16, the matter would fall within the jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court. The learned Judge, however, on the basis of the report of the Medical Board that he was about 19 years of age, directed that his case should proceed before the ordinary Court. The observations of the High Court having been made in a bail matter, the same could be treated to be only tentative in nature. It will be open to the petitioner to raise before the trial Court the question of his age and the jurisdiction of that Court.

With this observation, the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search