' This appeal arises from the decision, dated 25th January, 1982 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No, 7, Gujranwala, whereby the grievance petition of the appellant for his re-instatement was dismissed.
2. The appellant was a weaver and asserting that on 8th December, 1980 his services were terminated orally brought a grievance petition. The stand taken by the respondent was that the appellant had tendered his resignation which had been accepted. In the written statement it was also contended that no grievance notice had been served. The appellant tendered in evidence copy of grievance notice Exh. P. 1, postal receipt Exhs. P. 2 and A/D receipt Exh. P.
3. The signatures appearing on the A/D receipt purporting to be of the respondent do not tally with his admitted signatures appearing on various documents i. e. Written statement, application for adjournment, application for copy of the impugned decision, and receipt of delivery of the copy.
Even to a naked eye it is clear that the signatures do not tally in characteristics as well as in similarity. In these circumstances, it was necessary for the appellant to have examined the postman to prove that the notice was delivered to the respondent and to none else and -that the signatures appearing on the A/D receipt were made by the respondent. The learned trial Judge has rightly said that the signatures on the A/D receipt do not tally and that the service of grievance notice is not proved. Since the service of grievance notice is not proved, the other matters cannot be gone into. The resignation is also on the record, which prima facie shows that it bears the signatures of the appellant. It carries the date as 9th December, 1980 and on the same day it was accepted by the respondent. The grievance petition of the appellant was rightly dismissed. There is no force in the appeal which is dismissed in limine.