1. ' MUHAMMAD HALEEM, ACTG. C. This case the question which requires determination is as to whether the disputed piece of land is a part of Khasra No, 673 or 674. Khasra No, 674 measures 12 Kanais and stands transferred to the petitioner. The respondent claimed that the disputed land was included in Khasra No, 673, which was purchased by him pursuant to a registered sale-deed, dated 27-9-1974 from one Muhammad Rafi. Four years after the execution of this document another deed was executed by way of rectification of the error as the Khasra number was not mentioned in the sale-deed.
2. The trial Court dismissed the suit of the respondent for permanent injunction, but on appeal he succeeded and the revision filed against it was dismissed. The appellate Court had relied on the report of the Local Commissioner, but we are not satisfied either from this report or from the other material on the record as to whether the disputed land is a part of Khasra No, 673 or 674, and, accordingly, in our view this question requires further probe. This being so, the learned counsel for the parties agreed that the case be remanded to the trial Court for the determination of this question afresh. It will be open to the parties to lend such evidence as they might think proper for resolving the controversy.
3. ' The petition is, therefore, converted into an appeal and disposed of accordingly. There will be no order as to costs.