1. ' MUHAMMAD APZAL ZULLAH, J.-Leave to appeal has been sought from judgment dated 6-11-1983 of the Lahore High Court ; whereby a Constitutional petition arising out of a pre-emption matter ultimately decided by the Board of Revenue was dismissed.
2. During the hearing we felt difficulty in that all the necessary and relevant documents have not been placed on the record of the petition. It is the duty of the Advocate-on-Record under the rules of this Court, to place on record the relevant documents/copies (certified by him to be true copies provided they are not those copies which are to be officially certified as true copies). It will not be a legitimate excuse that the said material was not placed before the High Court. That would amount to the contravention of the spirit of the rule if not its letter.
3. ' The present case illustrates the contravention in a very vivid manner. The High Court having felt the same difficulty made the following observation in this behalf "The learned counsel has however not produced any document from the record of the trial Court to show that the said finding of fact recorded by the Additional Commissioner is not based on any oral or documentary evidence adduced before the trial Court.
4. ' He has also not produced any such document to show either that the point that the change was not recorded in the presence of right holders and the tenants of the village had ever been raised before Revenue Courts or that the same was not proved on record."
5. Taking serious note of this practice, and the conduct of petitioner projected through his A. O. R. It is held that he has disentitled himself to discretionary relief in this Court. We accordingly decline to grant leave to appeal in this case on this ground alone ; although otherwise too after hearing the learned counsel we felt that on the material placed before us, this petition merited dismissal.