' S. ABDUL JABEAR KHAN (CHAIRMAN). -Nasrullah Khan, Draftsman, Discharge Division (Canals), Irrigation and Power Department, Lahore, has filed this appeal under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunal Act, 1974, in which he has impleaded the Superintending Engineer, Headquarter Office of the Director, Floods, I & P Department Punjab, Lahore, Chief Engineer, Floods, Irrigation and Power Department Punjab, Lahore, and Secretary to Government of the Punjab, Irrigation and Power Department, Lahore as respondents.
2. By virtue of this appeal he has prayed that the impugned order, dated 17th January, 1982 and the resultant termination of the appellant's services be set aside and he may be allowed to continue as Draftsman in the office of Respondent No, 2.
3. Brief facts of the case are that after having Diploma of Civil Draftsman from the Government School of Engineering and Polytechnic Institute, Rasool, West Pakistan in Session 1967-68, appellant applied for the post of Draftsman in Sargodha Region. He was selected by Selection Promotion Committee No, 2, Sargodha and was appointed as a Draftsman vide letter, dated 21st May, 1980 in NPS-11. Prior to this, appellant had been working as Tracer in P & E Cell, Irrigation and Power Department, Civil Secretariat, Lahore. When certain posts of Draftsman fell vacant in the office of the Director Floods Punjab, Lahore, the appellant submitted his application for his transfer to Lahore through the Secretary, Irrigation and Power Department, who enquired from respondent No, 2 whether the appellant was acceptable to him. Respondent No, 2 informed the Secretary, Irrigation and Power Department that the appellant was acceptable to them provided sanction of the Finance Department was obtained in relaxation of ban for filling of the posts. When the said approval was received, respondent No, 2 made a reference to the Irrigation and Power Department but the same was not acceded to and they told the Director Floods that some other proposal be sent instead of one made in favour of the appellant. Later on two vacancies were advertised by respondent No, 2 for initial appointment in accordance with the West Pakistan Irrigation and Power Department's Service Rules, 1962, and the appellant applied for the said post. However, the case of the appellant was not approved as it was stated that he lacked necessary qualification. In the meantime Service Rules were changed and in pursuance of the said directive of respondent No, 3, the respondent No, 2 terminated the services of the appellant. He filed departmental appeal but the same was turned down. Hence this appeal.
4. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned District Attorney assisted by the representative of the Department and have perused the record of this case carefully with their assistance.
5. The stand of the appellant's counsel in this case is that when the appellant qualified the departmental examination there used to be one year course at the School of Engineering Rasool.
However, subsequently after some years, two years course was started. According to the learned counsel as rule 7(1) prescribed the qualifications of the appellant's service, it did not require that a candidate must have done one year or two years qualification and the only qualifications laid down was that the candidate must have passed the examination of Draftsman or Overseer from Government Engineering School, Rasool or hold a Diploma in Engineering from a recognized Institute, therefore, the termination of service of the appellant on the plea of lack of qualification, was absolutely unjustified.
6. On the other hand the stand taken by the Government (Respondent) is that the appellant only secured a certificate from the Government School of Engineering and Polytechnic Institute, Rasool, West Pakistan in the session 1967-68 and not a Diploma which was a must for the appointment of a Civil Draftsman. According to the learned District Attorney that the certificate secured by the appellant was for the session 1967-68 and not for session- 1966-67, as intimated by the Board of Technical Education. As the appellant did not possess a Diploma therefore, he was not eligible for the post of Draftsman in NPS-1l, hence his services were rightly terminated.
7. We have given our anxious thought to the arguments so advanced by the parties and find that only crucial point in this case would be whether the appellant was a qualified person for the post of Civil Draftsman in NPS-11 or not. There is also another point for consideration in this case that is the age factor of the appellant which also stood in his way.
8. We have given our due consideration to the points involved for the termination of his service and find that the appellant had only secured a certificate from the Government School of Engineering and Polytechnic Institute, Rasool, West Pakistan for the session 1967-68 and did not possess a Diploma which was a sine qua non for his appointment to the post in dispute. In view of the above, Irrigation and Power Department never expressed its willingness to the transfer of the appellant at any stage and it was advised to the Chief Engineer Floods that the vacancies of the Draftsman should filled in by qualified persons. This being the'A state of affair the Government rightly advised the Chief Engineer Floods to take action in accordance with para. 5 of his letter No, FC/81/4580, dated 21st November, 1981 while terminating the services of the appellant for the post of Draftsmen in NPS-11. With regard to the relaxation of age limit the order of the MLA/Governor of the Punjab, permitting relaxation of age in upper age limit to deserving in-service candidates is upto 5 years. In this particular case no relaxation was however, accorded by any authority.
9. In view of these two findings on facts which go against the appellant, we have no alternative but to dismiss the appeal as being without any merits. There will be no order as to costs.