Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1984 MLD 14

MUHAMMAD SHAFI and another vs JALAL DIN

Citation1984 MLD 14
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Civil Miscellaneous No. 1095/C of 1984 Regular Second Appeal No. 265 of
Judge(s)Muhammad Ilyas
ResultOrder accordingly

' The appellants, Muhammad Shafi and others, have made C.M. No, 1095-C/84, praying that the appeal may be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of the West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Act (Amendment) Ordinance, 1983.

2. It was contended by learned counsel for the appellants that the reversionary rights asserted by the respondent in the suit giving rise 4o the judgment and decree under appeal related to agricultural land acquired by one Bashir before the commencement of the Punjab Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1948 and, therefore, the judgment and decree passed in favour of the respondent had become void, in executable and of no legal effect. He also maintained that the appeal had abated due to the coming into force of the said Ordinance.

3. On the other hand, it was submitted by learned counsel for the respondent that there was no documentary evidence on the record to show that the said Bashir had inherited the agricultural land under custom before the 15th March, 1948, when the said Act had come into force and, therefore, the provisions of the said Ordinance were not attracted to the present case.

4. Karam Elahi was the father of Bashir referred to above. It is in the statement of the respondent, Jalal Din, as P.W.4, that the father of Bashir had died before the establishment of Pakistan. Pakistan came into being in 1947. It is not denied that Bashir had acquired the disputed land as an heir of his father (Karam Elahi). It is the respondent's own case that he had got it under custom. It can, therefore, be easily gathered from the pleadings of the respondent coupled with his above statement that Bashir had acquired the land in question under custom from his father before the coming into force of the said Act. In this view of the matter, the provisions of the said Ordinance are applicable to the appeal in hand.

5. It was by the said Ordinance that section 2-A was inserted in the West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1962. By operation of clause (b) of section 2-A the judgment and decree impugned herein have become void, in executable and of no legal effect, and under clause

(c) thereof the appeal before me has abated. These facts are hereby recorded. The C.M. is disposed of accordingly.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch