' The appeal captioned above arises from the decision, dated 4th April, 1983 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No, 1, Lahore, whereby the grievance petition of the appellant for his reinstatement in service was dismissed.
2. The allegations against the appellant were that he had realised fare from three lady passengers but had not issued tickets to them. He took up the plea that there were children with the ladies who may have destroyed the tickets issued by him. He also pleaded that the passengers in order to safe themselves implicated him.
3. There appears to be no other defect in the enquiry, except that the statement of the appellant was not recorded by the enquiry officer. It is written in the order sheet by the enquiry officer that the appellant could not give statement. This order does not show that the appellant was asked to give his statement. If the order had been that the appellant refused to get his statement recorded, it could be assumed that opportunity was given to him to make statement. Moreover, the signatures of the appellant were not received on the said order sheet.
4. As a result, the appeal is accepted and setting aside the impugned decision of the learned lower Court and the order of dismissal, the appellant is directed to be reinstated in service. As the appellant has succeed on a technical ground, he is not allowed back benefits. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.