' ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.-- The facts giving rise to this petition are, briefly, that Muhammad Hussain petitioner who is a Lambardar, was sent by the Tehsildar to civil prison for failing to deposit of the land revenue amounting to about Rs, 3,000 collected by him. He was met in the jail by Muhammad Sadiq, alongwith the local Patwari. It is alleged that he told him that he would pay the said amount to the Tehsildar and get him released. He was asked by Sadiq aforesaid to sign certain documents in this connection, which he signed promptly. He was thereafter released on 28-11-1969. A year later, on 28-10-1971, the petitioner filed a suit against Sadiq Muhammad respondent alleging that the documents got signed by him from the petitioner when he was in jail, were in fact, mutations regarding the alleged sale of 113 Kanals of land by Muhammad Hussain Lambardar (petitioner) in favour of Sadiq Muhammad and that the latter had obtained his (petitioner's) signature on the same by fraud and misrepresentation. The civil Court framed as many as 10 issues. Of them Issue No, 2 reads as follows:- "Whether the mutation No,103 sanctioned on 22-4-1970 was product of collusion and fraud? O.P.P."
' This as well as the other issues were decided by the learned Civil Judge against the petitioner. He then filed an appeal before the District Judge which was dismissed on 11-3-1979. The petitioner filed R.F.A. Before the High Court which, too, was dismissed by the impugned judgment.
' Hence the present petition.
2. Before us the main contention raised by the petitioner's counsel was that it has been established on the record that the signature on the mutations had been procured by the respondent through fraud and misrepresentation. However, in view of the concurrent finding by all the three Courts below on this question of fact we are not inclined to interfere with the same. The petition is, therefore, dismissed.