' M. S. H. QURAISHI, J.-The petitioner/dandlord is aggrieved by the judgment dated 1-4-1980 of the Lahore High Court, whereby in Second Appeal of the respondent/tenant, it set aside the order of the respondent's ejectment by reversing the findings on issues of default and personal use and dismissed the petitioner's ejectment application.
2. The rent for the alleged period of default, that is, November 1973 to March, 1974, had been remitted by three money orders, i,e, Exh. R/1, dated 22i2-1974 for Rs, 20, Exh. R/2, dated 9-3-1974 for Rs, 40 and Exh.R/3, dated 22-3-1974 for Rs,
40. Learned counsel urges that there was default in the payment of rent at least for the months of November and December, 1973.
3. On the question of personal use, the petitioner had taken the plea in her ejectment application that :{{URDU TEXT}} ' Her husband, who had appeared as her attorney, had stated : {{URDU TEXT}} ' The High Court had construed this requirement to be contrary to the ground taken in the ejectment application. Learned counsel contends tilat there was practically no conflict inasmuch as the petitioner's husband had been deposing in her place.
4. The points raised require consideration. Leave to appeal is, therefore, granted. Security shall be furnished in the sum of Rs, 2,500.