Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1984 CLC 112

Mst. RASHIDAN BIBI vs SHAFI MUHAMMAD

Citation1984 CLC 112
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Transfer Application No, 325/C of 1982
Date1983-06-11
Judge(s)Mian Mahboob Ahmad
ResultPetition accepted

' This is a petition under section 25-A of West Pakistan Family Courts Act for the transfer of the suit for restitution of conjugal rights titled Shafi Muhammad v. Mst. Rashidan Bibi from the Court of Mr. Salah-ud-Din, Judge Family Court Chunian to the Court of Mr. Nasim Ahmad, Judge Family Court, Lahore before whom two suits of the petitioner against the respondent, one for dissolution of marriage and the other for maintenance are already pending.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended : ' Firstly, that the petitioner has instituted two suits against the respondent, one for dissolution of marriage and the other for maintenance before the Judge Family Court Lahore on 6th June, 1981 whereas the respondent as a counterblast has filed the suit for restitution of conjugal rights before the Judge Family Court, Chunian on 11 the November, 1981 only for causing harassment to the petitioner ; ' Secondly, that common questions of law and fact are involved in the suits for dissolution of marriage and restitution of conjugal rights and it would be in the interest of justice that the two suits are tried by one and the same Court so that conflict of judgments could be avoided and.

' Lastly, that the petitioner is a Pardahnasheen lady having shifted to Lahore since March, 1979 and having residence here and, therefore, it will be inconvenient for her to go to Chunian to defend herself there.

3. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent contends that the petitioner is not ordinarily residing at Lahore and is still residing in the village at Chunian.

4. Having given consideration to the controversy involved I find that the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioner have force. These contentions also find support from the principles governing the transfer of cases arising under the Family Courts Act. It may also be observed than B the contention raised by the learned counsel for the respondent as to the ordinary place of residence of the petitioner is just a bare assertion having no support whatsoever and, therefore, it cannot be given any weight.

5. In view of the foregoing discussion, accepting this petition II direct that the suit for restitution of conjugal rights titled ShafiMuhammad v. Rashidan Bibi pending in the Court of Mr. Salah-ud-Din, Judge Family Court Chunian be withdrawn from that Court and entrusted to the Court of Mr. Malik Nasim Ahmad, Judge Family Court Lahore before whom two suits of the petitioner against the respondent, one for dissolution of marriage and the other for maintenance are already pending, for adjudication in accordance with law.

' There will however, be no order as to costs.

6. The parties shall appear before the transferee Court at Lahore on 22nd June, 1983.

7. The Court from which the case for restitution of conjugal rights titled Shafi Muhammad v. Mst.

Rashidan Bibi has been withdrawn shall ensure that the record of the case is transmitted to the transferee Court before the date fixed above.

8. The transferee Court shall consider the desirability of consolidation/trial together of the suit for dissolution of marriage and restitution of conjugal rights. In any case same dates of hearing shall be fixed in all the suits between the parties to avoid inconvenience to them.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch