1. ' S. A. NUSRAT, J.-This petition for special leave to appeal, is directed against the orders, dated 12-6- 1982 and 9-4-1983, whereby revision application and an application for review of the former order, were dismissed by a learned Single Jadge of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan.
2. ' According to the facts of the case, the petitioner had filed a suit for declaration that he was the owner of the disputed land which had fallen to his share by virtue of an agreement of exchange, dated 1-2-1973 executed between him and the respondent. On petitioner's application for grant of injunction, the learned trial Court passed an order, dated 8-4-1980 for maintaining status quo in respect of the suit land. The respondent later moved an application under Corder XXXIX, rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure for vacation of the order of the stay which was dismissed by the learned Civil Judge, on 27-4-1981. However, on appeal filed by the respondent, the order of status quo was vacated by the learned District Judge, D. I. Khan on 17-1-1982. The said order was challenged by the petitioner in Civil Revision before the High Court which was dismissed on 12-6- 1982 and his application for Review of the said order was also dismissed on 9-4-1983.
3. The facts of the case were examined by the learned District Judge and twice by the learned High Court, on petitioner's revision and review applications, and it was concurrently held that on account of a supervening event there was no justification left for continuing the order of status quo. In substance, therefore, a prima facie case was not found to exist in favour of the petitioner. In this petition, an interlocutory order is sought to be set aside on reappraisal of facts and evidence on the record for which, after going through the findings of the learned High Court, we find no justification to interfere with the discretion exercised, by the learned two Courts in the matter.
4. ' The petition fails and is dismissed accordingly.