1. ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.-Leave to appeal has been sought from judgment, dated 11-5-1983 of the Central Service Tribunal; whereby the respondent's service appeal was allowed.
2. ' Learned Deputy Attorney-General has, relying on Dr. Ehsan-ul-Haq v. The Province of Punjab and others (1), contended that the Tribunal could not interfere with the orders of promotion passed by the concerned authority, as no appeal in this behalf was competent.
3. It is not denied that questions of eligibility and consideration for promotion are distinguishable from those of prospects of promotion. As contended by the learned Deputy Attorney-General the law in this behalf has already been declared by this Court that being so no question or any other question of law of public importance is involved in this case. It I thus not a fit case for grant of leave to appeal under Article 212 of the Constitution. {{FOOT NOTE}} (1)1980 SCM R 972 {{FOOT NOTE}}