Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1984 PLC 1145

ABDUL RASHID vs GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE

Citation1984 PLC 1145
CourtLabour Appellate Tribunal
Case No.Appeal No, FD-110 of 1982
Date1982-04-25
Judge(s)Sardar Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi
ResultAppeal dismissed

' This appeal arises from the decision dated 14th January, 1982 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No, 4, Faisalabad, whereby the grievance petition of the appellant was dismissed.

2. The facts of the case are that an accident took place on 2nd September, 1978 on account of the collusion between the bus driven by the appellant and another bus coming from the opposite side, as a result of which two passengers died on the spot and the bus of the appellant was damaged and the loss was calculated to Rs, 50,567.25. The appellant was charge-sheeted to which he gave reply. An enquiry was held against him, which culminated in his dismissal. His contention was that the charge-sheet was time-barred. .On the other hand, the contention of the respondent was that the grievance petition was time-barred. The objection with regard to the charge-sheet being time- barred could be entertained if the appellant had proved that his petition was within time. He was dismissed on 29th June, 1980 as stated by him in his statement. The grievance notice was served by him on 7th July, 1980. Since no reply to the grievance notice was received by the appellant, he was required to bring the grievance petition upto 23rd September, 1980 but he brought.

3. The respondent was a Cashier. The allegations against the respondent were that on 28th April, 1976 he had received a cash the same on 23rd October, 1980 and thus it was obviously time- barred. Learned counsel for the appellant has argued that Mehraj Din, the solitary witness, who appeared before the Enquiry Officer, was not the witness of the incident and that he as stated by him had reached the place of occurrence after the buses had been removed from there. Therefore, from his evidence it could not be proved that the accident took place due to the rash and negligence act of the appellant. Merits cannot be discussed, inasmuch as the very grievance petition was not within time. The question whether the charge-sheet was time-barred or not also cannot be taken up because the grievance petition is time-barred. In these circumstances, the learned trial Judge has rightly dismissed the petition of the appellant. There is no force in the appeal, which is dismissed in limine.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch