1. The learned counsel challenges an interlocutory order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No, 5722-80. The appeal, however, is barred by subsection (3) of section 3 of the Law Reforms Ordinance as no such appeal lies against an interlocutory order. The learned counsel has referred to Ordinance X of 1980, the relevant portion of which reads as under :- "Notwithstanding anything contained in section 3 of the Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972 (XII of 1972) an appeal shall lie to the Bench of two or more Judges of a High Court from an interlocutory order made by a Single Judge of that Court, in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction."
2. ' This amendment, however, refers only to the cases arising under section 3 (1). The case in question came up before the learned Single'. Judge under section 3 (2) where the bar contained is till applicable. In view of the above this Inter Court Appeal is not maintainable and is dismissed as such.