This appeal arises from the decision dated 30th August, 1982 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court No. 5, Faisalabad, whereby the respondent was directed to be reinstated without back benefits.
2. The bus conducted by the respondent was checked on 19th June, 1981. Four passengers were found without tickets from whom the respon--dent is alleged to have recovered the fare. The respondent did not admit the allegations. Only the checker appeared as witness in the inquiry but no passengers who are alleged to have informed the checker that they had paid the fare were examined, Since fare was not paid in the presence, of checker what they stated in this respect is hearsay. Statements of passenger were produced but they do not bear their signatures. The respondent stated that no statement of any passenger was recorded in his presence, The learn-- ed Presiding Officer was, therefore, justified in doubting the genuinely of the said statement.
3. The learned Labour Court in above discussed circumstances was justified in directing the re-instatement of the respondent.
There is no force in the appeal which is dismissed in limine. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.