1. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.-Leave to appeal has been sought from dismissal of a Constitutional petition in limine by the Lahore High Court on 23-1-1982. The challenge was to an order passed by a learned Member, Board of Revenue, under section 40 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1967 for revision of record of rights.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has reiterated the legal and factual grounds which were pressed before the High Court at the time of hearing of the petition, namely, that section 40 did not permit the Board of Revenue to direct the revision of the records as certain prerequisites did not exist. When asked to elaborate, the learned counsel firstly, attempted to show that no notification which was necessary under the said provision was issued, but, could not stress the point when pointed out that this factual aspect was not pressed in the High Court. He then argued that the order of the Board of Revenue would be hit by principles of waiver, estoppel and laches. We do not find any justification for importing these principles. In so far as the exercise of the power under section 40 is concerned, the revision of the record of rights is relatable to the justification found in each case and that depends upon the merits thereof. In the present case on factual aspects, the learned Single Judge in the High Court, having examined the contentions put forward from the petitioners' side, held that the order was made after due inquiry at the spot and that it could not be considered as arbitrary. We do not find any justification for interference. This petition accordingly is dismissed.
3. S. Q.