Pakistan Case Law← Search
1971 PLC 86

MOZAMMEL HAQUE vs MESSRS AEG ENGINEERING PAKISTAN LTD., DACCA

Citation1971 PLC 86
CourtLabour Court
Case No.Complaint Case No. 329 of 1969
Date1970-07-04
Judge(s)Muhammad Karim, S. A. Hakem, Nurul Islam Khan
ResultN/A

ORDER

1. MD. NURUL ISLAM KHAN (CHAIRMAN). This is an applica--tion under section 25(1)(6) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965, hereinafter referred to as the Act.

2. The case of the first party is that he was a permanent worker under the second party for the last 3 years drawing a last pay of Rs. 150'00 per month. He was working at Joydebpur Site till 1-9-69 when he was called to the Head Office of the second party. After the payment of wages that afternoon the Manager of the second party told him that as there was no sufficient work he should come after a fortnight and during this period he would be paid wages as per rules that is, 50 % of his wages as lay off benefit. But when he requested the Manager to give him a notice in writing he was told that no notice was necessary as his words were as good as a notice. After the expiry of the said period when be reported for duty, the Manager asked him to come after 2/3 days, but he was not given work after 2 days. He was again told to come on the next day. So he vent, but to no effect.

3. He was not given any work. On 23rd September 1969, he was informed that he was dismissed. He sent a grievance petition on 24-9-69. But he received no reply. Hence this petition praying for re- instatement to his former post with full back wages.

4. The second party was found absent on repeated calls. It appears on hearing the first party that his case has been well established.

5. It is therefore, ordered that the first party be re-instated to ht former post with all back wages by the second party within 30 (thirty) days from the date of passing this order.

6. Members on consultation agree with my above decision.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search