' This is a revision petition against the order of the Commissioner, Multan dated 30-8-1982 whereby he rejected the appeal of the petitioner against the order of District Collector, Multan dated 27-4- 1981 vide which he resumed Sqr. No,. 80/1 to 10 msasuring 75K-12M situated in Chak No,. 19/9-R Tehsil Khanewal from Hakim Ali respondent which stood allotted to him under Criminal Tribes Scheme.
2. The facts of the case are that the respondent was allotted the disputed land under Criminal Tribes Scheme. He applied on 21-12-1980 to the Assistant Commissioner/Collector for alienating Killa No,. 4 measuring 4 Kanals in favour of the petitioner. Assistant Commissioner/Collector, after obtaining the report from the Tebsildar sent the case to the District Collector for necessary orders.
The District Collector, after considering the case and keeping in view the policy instructions resumed the tenancy from the respondent due to violation of condition of the scheme. Aggrieved by this order the petitioner filed an appeal before Commissioner, Multan contending therein that she obtained the land in exchange through a decree of the Civil Court dated 2-5-1959 by paying Rs, 20,000 to the respondent on loan and that mutation No,. 361 to this effect was sanctioned on 12- 11-1979 and that the District Collector was not competent to pass the order dated 27-4-1981 for the resumption of land. The Commissioner after hearing the parties observed that sanction to alienate the land under section 19 of the Colony Act was not obtained from the competent authority and that the decree of the Civil Court could not had been executed in view of the provision of section 19 read with sections 18 and 36 of the Colony Act. He therefore dismissed the appeal and directed that the mutation should be reviewed. Hence this revision petition.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner at length, gone through the grounds of revision and perused the record of the case. The learned counsel could not rebut the findings of the lower courts. The lower courts have passed legal orders and I do not find, any wrong in these. The revision petition is hereby dismissed.