Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2025 SHC 172

Mst. Mai Pathani vs SHO P.S Patni Sukkur & others

Citation2025 SHC 172
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Crl. Misc. Application No.S-88 of 2025
Date2025-02-21
Judge(s)Riazat Ali Sahar
ResultApplication Dismissed

ORDER

1. Statements filed by respondents No.1 to 3 are taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. On perusal of impugned order dated 30.01.2025, it appears that learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Sukkur has dismissed the application filed by applicant seeking permission to record her second statement under section 164 CrPC for the reasons that there is no exceptional circumstance to justify for doing so.

2. From perusal of impugned order, it appears that learned Additional Sessions Judge has assigned valid and cogent reasons while passing the impugned order and no illegality or infirmity is found in the impugned order requiring interference of this Court. Accordingly, instant Crl. Misc. Application is dismissed

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch