S. ABDUL JABBAR KHAN (CHAIRMAN).-Mr. Mamoon-ur-Rashid, Headmaster, Government Pak Land Middle School, Shad Bagh, Lahore, has filed this appeal under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act of 1974 in which he has impleaded Secretary to Government of the Punjab, Education Department, Lahore, and District Education Officer, Lahore, as respondents.
2. By virtue of this appeal, he has prayed that respondent No. 1 be directed to fix appellants pay in Revised National Pay Scales and respondent No. 2 be directed to restore Dearness Allowances permissible to him under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974.
3. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant was working as Headmaster, Government Pak Land Middle School, Shad Bagh, which was nationalised in 1972. He was drawing his old pay scale in 1977, when Revised National Pay Scales were introduced. The appellant opted for Revised National Pay Scales in 1977.
4. The grievance of the appellant is that he has not been treated as an optee for Revised National Pay Scales and his representation etc., has been rejected. Hence this appeal.
5. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the appellant himself and have perused the parawise comments and have also heard the learned District Attorney assisted by representative of the Department.
6. It has been urged on behalf of the appellant that he did opt for the Revised National Pay Scales, a fact which is being denied by the respondents.
7. We have looked into the record of this case and find that his application Annexure `B' was diarised in the register there. We accept the Contention that he opted for the Revised National Pay Scales in 1977.
8. For this matter we have now looked into Annexure `B' as a valid document duly diarised in the register but find that the document itself is not a complete option as lot of conditions have been attached by the appellant while making this request to the Government. We have also seen the prescribed form by which others of his service were required to give their option in this respect. This form discloses that the optee had only to say that he opts for the Revised- National Pay Scales or not. In this manner Annexure Bon which reliance has been placed cannot be considered a regular request as prescribed by the Department for opting the National Pay Scales, 1977. It seems that the appellant first of all considered the old pay scales more beneficial to him and kept on drawing the same regularly. His conditional option was beset with many riders in order to gain benefits from both ends. In view of above, we have no alternative but to accept the stand taken by the Department that the appellant has been getting the dearness allowances and additional dearness allowances till todate sanctioned by the Government from time-to time.
9. The result is that we do not find any merits in this appeal, which is dismissed accordingly.
However, parties will bear their own costs.