This appeal arises from the decision dated18-1-1982 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No. 2, Lahore, whereby the petition for restoration of the grievance. Petition dismissed in default on 5-8-1981 was dismissed.
2. The case of the appellant was fixed on 5-8-1981 for evidence. On the said date the counsel for the appellant namely, Mr. Har4id Ali Mirza informed the court that he had no instructions to prosecute the case and requested that he be allowed to withdraw it. The appellant had not appeared, therefore the case was dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. The ground given by the appellant in his petition .For restoration was that he had by mistake noted down the date as 5-10-1981 and had come to know about the dismissal of the case on 5-10- 1981. Application for restoration was given on 2-11-1981 supported by an affidavit. On behalf of the respondent a counter-affidavit was filed. No diary, its copy; brief or its copy was produced to show that actually the date was noted down wrongly. The appellant. Knew that the plea taken by him was that he had noted down the date wrongly, so he could have realised anti counsel also must have advised him to produce the diary or the brief. Thus the very plea that the appellant had wrongly noted down the date is false or at least stands disproved. The petition for restoration was, therefore, rightly dismissed. There is no force in the appeal, which is dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.