' Khuda Bakhsh petitioner by means of this Constitutional petition has challenged the order dated 16-3-1983 of the learned Rent Controller, Faisalabad passed under section 13(6) of the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959 directing him to deposit arrears of rent @ Rs, 300.00 p.m. And future rent at the same rate before 15th of each month ; in respect of the property in dispute occupied by him as tenant under respondent No. 1.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the learned Rent Controller had acted contrary to law and procedure having the force of law in fixing approximate rate of rent of the disputed property on the statement of respondent No. 1 made on oath. It was also stated that the exorbitant rate of rent fixed by the learned Rent Controller was not justified and amounted to ousting the petitioner from the premises in dispute as it was not possible for him to comply with the order.
3. I have considered the contention raised by learned counsel for the petitioner. The tenancy in this case is not regulated by a written rent deed. The petitioner has not placed on the record any receipt to show that he was paying rent of the disputed property at the rate of Rs, 100.00 p.m. In support of his case. On the contrary respondents averred in ejectment petition that the petitioner had been paying rent at the rate of Rs, 300.00 per month.
The contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner even if assumed to have some force do not call for interference in the impugned order in writ jurisdiction particularly when he has not pleaded lack of 4 jurisdiction in the Rent Controller to pass the impugned order. Even otherwise the learned Rent Controller has fixed only approximate rate of rent which is liable to modification and eventual adjustment.
4. It has been noticed in some cases that the Rent Controller have exhibited depreciable tendency to fix tentative rate of rent on landlords' statement made on oath at exorbitant rate, without providing opportunity to the tenant to accept or repudiate such statement and following the requirements of law as envisaged under the provisions of "The Oaths Act X of 1873". It is obligatory for the Rent Controller while passing the order under section 13(6) of the Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959 to determine the tentative rate of rent by application of judicial mind so that the order pass by him in that behalf may not create hardship for either of the parties.
5. Subject to the observation made above this petition is dismissed in limine.