1. ' ASLAM RIAZ HussAIN, J.-This order shall dispose of three petitions (i) C. P S. L. A. No, 721 of 1980, filed by Habib Khan etc., (ii) C. P. S. L. A. No, 1112 of 1980 filed by Begum Surraya Aslam Khan and (iii) C. P.
2. S. L. A. No, 580 of 1981 also filed by Surraya Aslatn Khan, as they arise out of the same facts and the same question is involved in all the three petitions.
2. The facts giving rise to these petitions are, briefly, as follows :- Respondents 4 to 44 in C. P. No, 721 of 1980 had filed a claim for the land left by them in villages Jawaharpur and Jarira, in District Delhi (India). The claim was verified by Mr. Muhammad Abbas, Claims Commissioner, on 25-5-1960 to the extent of 2,12,220 P. I. Us., on the basis of the revenue record relating to the years 1908 and 1909 and oral evidence produced by the said respondents to the effect that they were owners of the land in the said villages. The aforementioned respondents then got land allotted against their verified claim in various parts of Pakistan. It was, however, reported that the two uillages in question had been acquired in 1911 by the then British Government of India for establishment of the new 'capital of Delhi, and the two villages were, therefore no longer in existence. Moreover the said respondents bad received the compensation for the said land. The Officer on Special Duty of the Rehabilitation Department, Lahore, therefore, wrote a letter to the Revenue authorities in India asking about the correct position. On receipt of their reply the matter was examined by Mr. Hidayat Ullah Mokal, Settlement Commissioner, who by his order dated 6-7-1972, prima facie found the entire verification having been obtained_ by fraud. He issued notice to the respondents and directed them not to sell any of the properties obtained by them against the said claim.
3. ' Aggrieved by this order the aforementioned respondents filed a writ petition (No, 452 of 1972) before the High Court but the 'same was dismissed in limine, on 8-7-1974. They then filed a petition for leave to appeal before this Court, which was dismissed on 2-7-1976.
4. ' A full-fledged inquiry was, thereafter, held by Ch. Muhammad Siddiq, the then Settlement and Claims Commissioner, Punjab, who recorded a lengthy order on 23-2-1978 holding that he had no jurisdiction to review the order with respect to the correctness of verification of claim after 31-3- 1965. He, however, held that no fraud had been committed by the respondents aforesaid.
5. ' Feeling aggrieved against this order Habib Khan filed a writ petition No, 444/R of 1978) which was dismissed by a learned Single Judge vide the impugned judgment dated 27-4-1980.
6. ' Hence the present petition.
7. The petitioner's counsel relied on Habib Khan v. Settlement and Claims Commissioner and Muhammad Farooq Imam v. The Claims Commissioner, Pakistan, Lahore and 2 others , to argue that after the amendment of Registration of Claims (Displaced Persons) Act, 1956 (Act III of 1956), by Displaced Persons Laws Amendment Ordinance (XIII of 1964), the Claims Commissioner, could not review an order of verification of any claim after 31st March, 1965 when the record whereof had not been called for before that date.
8. ' Mr. Shahzad Jahangir Standing Counsel for the Settlement Department as well as Mr. Muhammad Nasim appearing for the Settlement Department, supported the three petitions.
9. Leave is, therefore, granted to consider whether the Claims Commissions had any jurisdiction after 31-3-1965 to revise or review an order of the Clai 4 Officer verifying a claim the record whereof had not been called for befor that date.
10. ' Security in the sum of Rs, 2,000.
11. ' We are informed that leave has also been granted to consider the same question in C. P. S. L. A. No, K-209 of 1981, filed by the Additional Settlement Commissioner, Karachi.
12. ' Appeals arising out of the present petitions and that arising out of C. P. S. L. A. No, K-209 of 1981, shall be heared together. PLD 1979 SC 975 p L 1975 Lah, 1149